[bisq-network/proposals] Change fee model to a more simple one? (#31)

[Steve Jain]

Just realized I acknowledged @ManfredKarrer's post and forgot about it. Thanks @cbeams for bumping it. 

I just re-wrote the fee explanation in FAQs. Check out the PR [here](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/73). There's a screenshot there so you can quickly see how it looks.

Regarding the proposal itself, I don't think the fee structure is really that complicated. It _seems_ complicated, I think, because it hasn't been presented clearly (both in documentation and in Bisq itself), but I think that can be fixed.

There's only 1 variable for offer takers, and 2 variables for offer makers...

In the USD market, distant offers have been a problem. Until 1-2 weeks ago I was routinely seeing many 25-30% premiums on offers to sell BTC. If anything, from my vantage point, the formula isn't aggressive enough to discourage such offers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/31#issuecomment-409308422
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180731/469896b6/attachment.html>