[bisq-network/roles] Proposals Maintainer (#30)

[Chris Beams]

## 2018.05 report

As can be seen in the results of [this query](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=updated%3A2018-05-01..2018-06-01+sort%3Aupdated-desc+):

 - 6 proposals were closed as approved
 - 1 proposal was closed as stalled
 - 2 new proposals were created

I believe the proposals process is working quite well now, and it's reasonable to believe it'll only get better from here as more contributors get familiar with it.

One potential area for improvement, though, is around reviewing proposals. On average we're getting just 3–5 reactions to proposals. If that is a reflection of how many contributors actually care about each proposal, then that's fine (we don't want people wasting their time weighing on on stuff they don't know about or don't care about), but if these numbers are a reflection of the fact that people just don't know that the proposals are there, or haven't prioritized reading through them, then it would be good to get more engagement. Be sure to watch the repository if you're not already doing so.

If you have feedback on this process, please speak up. You can do that in a comment here, in the `#proposals' Slack channel, or in an issue on the proposals repository.

/cc bisq-network/compensation#74

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/30#issuecomment-393863743
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180601/efc6a950/attachment-0002.html>