[bisq-network/bisq-docs] Improvement suggestion for getting-started.adoc (#63)

[Mark Batten-Carew]

No, it is clear.   I hadn't read the documentation about the arbitration
process when I wrote that email.

I now understand.
Thanks!
Mark

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Steve Jain <notifications at github.com>
wrote:

> Hi @Mark-BC <https://github.com/Mark-BC>, when you enter a trade, the
> seller's BTC (the bitcoin being traded) is locked into a multisig wallet
> along with your BTC deposit.
>
> So the seller's BTC is on the line if they decide to be dishonest. If they
> choose not to acknowledge your fiat payment, they risk losing their BTC
> when the trade goes to arbitration.
>
> This is mentioned in the doc in the first paragraph of step 2
> <https://docs.bisq.network/getting-started.html#2-send-deposit-to-trade-wallet>.
> Perhaps it could be made clearer?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-docs/issues/63#issuecomment-394049953>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZLvl04fuXiwxeaDA4-81_SSK1PVeCZOks5t4faugaJpZM4UTmsB>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-docs/issues/63#issuecomment-394051018
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180601/f87df0a1/attachment.html>