[bisq-network/proposals] Certification for ownership of a bank account (#23)

[riclas]

Why would it not help if you can certify the withdrawal for yourself?
I want to remove the arbitration entirely from the process. Just make each
user responsible for his certifications, and help him by storing signed
certificates for future trades. What do you believe is very cumbersome in
that process?
i'm down for that work if it means i'm trading safely. If this works as i'm
seeing, I might actually borrow that idea for my own clients who don't want
to share documents...

2018-06-04 19:38 GMT+01:00 Manfred Karrer <notifications at github.com>:

> @riclas <https://github.com/riclas>
> Re: "what if you sign the certificate as a seller? i.e. each certificate
> on the network would have a list of signatures, and you have to check if
> one is yours."
> You mean that you sign only your trade peer and if your repeat the trade
> with the same you can be sure that the is not a scammer?
> That would be very cumbersome and will not help you with most traders you
> have never traded before.
> Also there is no communication path between the traders atm.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394455876>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFWUX9QQ08x169W-4XQUeliB1BN2Dglks5t5X6-gaJpZM4UXw49>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394489404
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180604/052358c7/attachment.html>