[bisq-network/bisq-desktop] Feasibility for replacing Bitcoinj with Bitcoin Core SPV (#1062)

chirhonul notifications at github.com
Mon Jun 25 14:11:52 UTC 2018


Yes, I'd suggest we look into Neutrino (BIP157/BIP158)-based setups instead of bloom filters (BIP37). BIP37 is generally seen among core devs as fundamentally incompatible with privacy, and also imposes disproportional cost on full nodes (DoS vector). The main drawback of the GCS-based light node protocol is that CPU cost can be higher for the client, which could make things slow for a mobile device, but as Bisq is a desktop that should not be an issue for us.

I'd be happy to contriute here, once I understand more how the bisq -> bitcoinJ integration is built.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/issues/1062#issuecomment-399965847
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180625/f396772f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list