[bisq-network/bisq-core] Fix typos (#109)

[Chris Beams]

cbeams commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ Please select one of the existing MultiSig transactions from your wallet which w
 deposit transaction used in the failed trade.\n\n\
 You can find the correct transaction by opening the trade details window (click on the trade ID in the list)\
  and following the trading fee payment transaction output to the next transaction where you see \
-the Multisig deposit transaction (the address starts with 3). That transaction ID should be \
+the MultiSig deposit transaction (the address starts with 3). That transaction ID should be \

What's important is a word's usage and spelling in the wider world, not how we happen to have (perhaps wrongly) spelled it throughout our own materials. My quick searches showed that "multisig" is the most common convention, e.g. from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Multisignature:

> Multisignature (multisig) refers to requiring more than one key to authorize a Bitcoin transaction. It is generally used to divide up responsibility for possession of bitcoins.

If you have evidence to the contrary please present it, but I think that going with "multisig" is going with the flow / current convention. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-core/pull/109#discussion_r186966198
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180509/eebc387d/attachment-0002.html>