[bisq-network/proposals] Trading protocol v2 without arbitrators (#52)
chris-belcher
notifications at github.com
Sun Nov 25 00:29:49 UTC 2018
> A majority attack (if >50% of stakeholders - incl. meriticracy) is always possible but its irrational and would prooke a fork.
This would be rational if the adversary can steal more money from traders than the cost of ~50% of all voting DAO tokens. This model then implies that the cost of the DAO has to be more than twice the value of trades happening in a given period.
Can you go into more detail of this fork?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-441406050
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181124/f2c24e04/attachment.html>
More information about the bisq-github
mailing list