[bisq-network/proposals] Filtering inactive assets (#41)

[Harry MacFinned]

Since I wrote the previous proposal, I thought also on the follow-up, and without speaking with Manfred, I arrived roughly at analog conclusions :

1/ maintain free listing ... but only for the **first** enlisting. (warmup phase)
So it's up to the candidates to **profit** from this opportunity, or to waste it.
And nobody can reproach Bisq not being altcoins friendly.
Bisq is altcoins friendly, but Bisq is a living meeting place, not a dead altcoins memorial.

2/ if the first free enlisting doesn't lead to enough trading (or at least offers) and ends with unlisting, then the next enlisting is **no more free**.
And the payment has to be done in **BSQ** is probably a good solution for multiple reasons: legal, good for the BSQ token itself, good for the project human ressources if earned BSQ, good for involving the serious candidates and having them as contact, etc.

3/ as for the delays, many solutions are possible, 120 days seems ok, but we may also say that the delay is 2 (or 3) releases.
imo, candidates have to fully integrate the marketing/trading strategy **immediately** with the listing efforts. If this is not done as a bundle, I see the probability of succeeding as very low.

4/ I found also that fixing threshold is not so obvious. Maybe that instead of fixing such threshold we can just consider the ranking, and eliminate the worst performers. Or a combination of threshold + ranking ?

Anyway, if the listing policy is changed, we need to **strongly** warn the candidates to not waste their 1st trial.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181005/598870c5/attachment.html>