[bisq-network/proposals] Fee model for Asset listing (#42)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Sun Oct 7 23:20:26 UTC 2018


Regarding the above idea to use DAO voting:
I am myself pretty strong against that. It would pollute the more important governance function of DAO voting with asset spam. Also the voters should not waste their time to evaluate a new asset. So I think that is not a good idea to follow up... 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/42#issuecomment-427695772
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181007/d179faec/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list