[bisq-network/proposals] Add option for trade-intents which do not require to be online (#44)

[Manfred Karrer]

@clearwater-trust 
I have not tough much about the details... but basically the intent could be treated as a normal offer, so u pay the fee and reserve the required funds in your wallet. That helps to avoid spam and does not require an extra step later when the user goes online. So the intent is just a special form of an offer which was taken offline.  

Yes maybe we can just leave it up to the maker how he wants to get contacted. I just fear that not having a integrated standard it will make the process more manual... but will require more detail work on it to see if that is the case.

@initCCG Yes, "ghost offer" is a nice image ;-)
 It should be easy to the user and maybe it is default any offer where the maker goes offline stays as "ghost" and a taker can trigger a "wake up call". For the taker maybe we also would need some "costs" to avoid spam behavior. Not sure if a fee payment is here good as he might move over to other offers if the maker does not respond fast. But maybe its enough if the funds needed for the taking are reserved so he has less available funds in the wallet. That should add enough protection here to avoid abuse.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/44#issuecomment-427720938
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181007/b268bb3c/attachment.html>