[bisq-network/support] Fee reimbursement for trade Xo27vzoy (#130)

[Chris Beams]

@KanoczTomas, this one is an example of the bug I mentioned where a previously valid deposit transaction shows up in a failed tx. If you follow the maker and taker transactions in a block explorer, you'll find that they never make their way into a deposit tx. And if you work backward in a block explorer from the deposit tx shown above, you'll find that completely unrelated maker and taker transactions feed into it. You'll also find that the deposit tx is older than the maker and taker txs for this trade, which is impossible.

So, in the end, you can just follow the instructions in the description above:

> Lost maker and taker fees will be reimbursed with #101

Hope the explanation above helps. Like I mentioned, it's a nasty bug, and pretty confusing the first times you run into it.

Let me know if you have further questions (here or in Slack).

I'm putting this back in the TODO column, as it should be straightforward to process now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/130#issuecomment-430621233
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181017/4e8ddb8c/attachment.html>