[bisq-network/proposals] Reimbursement proposal/request (#49)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Sat Oct 20 16:59:40 UTC 2018


@sqrrm Yes I think technically its exactly the same as a compensation request but conceptually it is something else and for the user I think its better to distinguish both.
The importance of that depends on the new dispute resolution model we have in mind. We will need a bit longer to get that well thought out and wrtten in a proposal but when we will use that new model we should have it integrated in the DAO as well and not just squeeze it in to an existing feature IMO. 

@cbeams Yes good point. But the balance between received BTC and BTC needed for reimbursing for failed trade fees is (should be) very asymetic. And anyway as soon we get a bit more dev power we should try to fix those issues so that they become super rare.
We also can use the current BTC donation fund for that. I will suggest also to add a bonded role for the one who is controlling that fund (me atm). 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181020/91e80c38/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list