[bisq-network/proposals] Proposal for new trade protocol without the need for arbitrators (#52)

FĂ©lix notifications at github.com
Thu Oct 25 10:23:29 UTC 2018


I very much like the 2-of-2 multisig approach without the arbitrator. It is **simpler** and requires cooperation. Complexity and support can be added _outside the transaction_ itself: mediators, etc.

However I don't see clearly if the advantages of the the second part outweigh the added complexity. By creating the timelocked tx to a donation address and the insurance/reimbursement by the DAO in BSQ you are adding many different players, uncertain outcomes and complex incentives. Maybe it is the best way to do it... but I think it needs more explanation/testing.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-432997721
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181025/e6703ee0/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list