[bisq-network/proposals] Listing fee policy - step 1 (general) (#35)

[Chris Beams]

I see. My preference would be to continue this proposal here in one place, as opposed to creating a second issue as it’s not clear to me that there is a consensus on this proposal and that in any case the particulars of how a listing fee would be implemented are inseparable from merely agreeing that it should be done. Is there some strong reason to close this this and create a second?

> On Sep 7, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Harry MacFinned <notifications at github.com> wrote:
> 
> I have seen that quite all closed proposals have a label:
> approved, rejected, stalled, moved, invalid, etc.
> So I presumed it's something necessary to pursue (?).
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/35#issuecomment-419354641
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180907/2dbb809d/attachment-0001.html>