[bisq-network/proposals] Listing fee policy - step 1 (general) (#35)

[Harry MacFinned]

1/ My understanding is that there is a weighted majority of stakeholders (>300.000 BSQ) who agree that a change must be done. Which was the basic point of the proposal.
There is no 100% agreement, since there is at least one -1 vote. (Is 100% consensus reachable for such a delicate topic ? is it mandatory to go further ?).

2/ The proposal was open for 20 days, so everybody willing to participate could do it.

3/ This thread has already 30 comments and 14 participants. Which is already the max reached by a proposal, and 2 or 3 times the average number of comments than for other proposals. 

1/+2/+3/ = strong reason to close. imo it is enough for this basic step. 

I'm not sure it's mandatory to have a second proposal. My personal feeling is the subject is a bit delicate, and I would proceed with small steps. And if the steps are really small, maybe simple PRs could do the job (better than proposal which are not meant for small things : https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html)

For my part, I'll not add a proposal in the proposal, I feel the present discussion is long enough and it would not help to make things understandable.
I feel the present proposal must have now a clear labelled status. It's time and it's legitimate.

However, of course, if you @cbeams want to continue in accordance with your will, please of course, just do it. You're co-founder. For me, it's 100% ok so.
I don't feel necessary to be assigned to this proposal. I did it at first strictly to help.
Btw, I'll be on holidays from monday 10th to monday 17th, so unable to participate.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/35#issuecomment-419364239
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180907/706e1494/attachment.html>