[bisq-network/compensation] For August 2018 (#110)

[chirhonul]

> Maybe you could separate the technical report from the compensation request itself. I think it was a @cbeams advice, and I find that doubly helpful, for the writer, and for the readers.

Thanks for the suggestion @HarryMacfinned! I will consider that next time.. for last month, there were no github issues describing the specific technical projects (general reliability engineering in preparation for the DAO, mostly) so I'm not sure where the best place would be for the more technical work in this case..

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/110#issuecomment-419704932
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180909/4dccfe1e/attachment.html>