[bisq-network/compensation] For September 2018 (#120)

[Manfred Karrer]

@joachimneumann 
Thanks for the detailed overview and reasoning about the valuation.

I personally would have seen it more in the 20 000 BSQ range, but 25 000 is OK for me as well. As you pointed out it is very difficult to find the right number for the value added to the project. 
It is good that you are doing the request with sufficient time before the voting so stakeholders can add their comments and discuss.

@bisq-network/contributors: It would be good to make that a rule to make the compensation requests earlier. @ripcurlx Could you send out the invites for requests a week earlier and mention that?

I would like to invite all stakeholders (@bisq-network/contributors) to add their opinion to the above valuation. We are in an important process to find out the best model how we valuate such bigger efforts and there will be more in future (API, redesign/rebranding, Mobile app from @blabno,  DAO,...). So it is good to have an active process how we as a community find a consensus how to deal with valuation and what is considered a fair value.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/120#issuecomment-424039079
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180924/58209b41/attachment-0001.html>