[bisq-network/proposals] Charge a fee to list assets (#35)

sqrrm notifications at github.com
Fri Sep 28 09:23:22 UTC 2018


I'm conflicted but @cbeams argument of custody of funds does put me back to not taking a listing fee at this time. I'm still not sure about continue spending time on listing new ones at this point. I have changed my vote on this proposal so by default nothing changes. I agree that it has been good to let the issue get some air and it will surely resurface as soon as BSQ is online.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/35#issuecomment-425377073
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180928/54bce770/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list