[bisq-network/compensation] For March 2019 (#259)

[eyalron33]

@sqrrm By "officially managing resources" I mean by that manage have a bond in the DAO.

I'm not so clear what does "to fork the DAO" means (at least in the technical implementation we created). Do you mean something like making a new competing DAO? 

When people with bonded roles switch a DAO, they lose their bond in the DAO they left. They may decide to do that because the compensation for switching will be bigger than the bond they lose. However, at least it will be obvious that the asset they maintained in the old DAO is no longer considered official by the community.

I'm thinking since a long time to make services for DAOs (but didn't find the time for it yet). Such services would "read" the DAO records to know who is allowed to access them. Would this solve the problem you describe?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/259#issuecomment-479682066
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190403/6763a315/attachment.html>