[bisq-network/proposals] Off-chain trade protocol based on symmetric security deposits in BTC (#76)

[Harry MacFinned]

@ManfredKarrer wrote
> arbitrator as 3rd key holder

I guess this is how things works already today in Bisq (?)
If yes, could it be imaginable that the 3rd key is not provided a priori to the arbitrator,
but instead, sliced in several parts, and all the slices being disseminated in the Bisq network ?
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_sharing
And it's only in case of dispute that the slices are reconciled and provided to the arbitrator.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/76#issuecomment-480208869
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190405/c63733fb/attachment.html>