[bisq-network/proposals] Off-chain trade protocol based on symmetric security deposits in BTC (#76)

Harry MacFinned notifications at github.com
Fri Apr 5 09:23:23 UTC 2019

@ManfredKarrer wrote
> arbitrator as 3rd key holder

I guess this is how things works already today in Bisq (?)
If yes, could it be imaginable that the 3rd key is not provided a priori to the arbitrator,
but instead, sliced in several parts, and all the slices being disseminated in the Bisq network ?
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_sharing
And it's only in case of dispute that the slices are reconciled and provided to the arbitrator.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190405/c63733fb/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list