[bisq-network/proposals] Distributed reputation system (#78)

[Manfred Karrer]

Yes I see the liability issue not different. I think there is no risk for the signer as long he can proof that the fiat transfer really happened. All what he would be required in case if the above scam scenario is to provide the sybils account data and then the sybil need to proof that he did a real transfer with the scamme and he will fail on that. Of course in reality it will be harder as peers will not be online anymore, etc...But I think just to have that option in place makes it very risky for the sybil to collude.

Maybe we need to add another note in the "Confirm fiat" popup so that it is clear that this confirmation has an additional security context. But not sure if that gets too complicate then? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/78#issuecomment-485893000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190423/74d99063/attachment.html>