[bisq-network/proposals] Distributed reputation system (#78)

[mpolavieja]

99,9% of honest users when the liquidity is still low.  But liquidity is growing and if because of that honest users drop to 98% that could mean fiat trading is doomed. Chargebacks from stolen accounts will kill market makers, even if they are very few and low quantity (below 300€) because the default behaviour of Bank when a chargeback from a stolen account occurs, is to target the recipient (the market maker) as suspcious of a criminal activity.    

Fully agree, however, that the solution based on big deposits is very promising.  It is the one I like the most, but I fear that it would also be an important barrier of entry for small traders.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/78#issuecomment-486002455
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190423/c107789f/attachment.html>