[bisq-network/proposals] Delay payout for Fiat trades if buyers account is fresh (#77)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Tue Apr 30 00:06:40 UTC 2019

The Securiyt deposit for the buyers is defined by the offer maker. The deposit for the seller is fixed.
So yes the machinism is the same but instead of atm 5% min. deposit I would recommend 15% to reduce the risks for a scammer willing to wait 4 weeks and then hopes to can cash out faster as the the first chargebacks happen.

 >  In my view, an account that doesn´t have a "signed" trade should be treated similar to a zero days age account.

So you mean we should keep 4 weeks delay forever if one has not trades with a traders who can sign him? 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190429/6a86c6dc/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list