[bisq-network/proposals] Finding a unified test framework for Bisq (#74)

Bernard Labno notifications at github.com
Tue Aug 6 11:05:51 UTC 2019


I also strive for high test coverage and I can assure you that Arquillian is the way to go.
I have been using it extensively with Bisq API over last year and a half and it made my life a lot easier. It truly isolates Bisq clients which is very important for e2e tests.
And it does not stop you from writing lower level integration tests without Arquillian. You apply Arquillian only to the test classes you choose.

So I'm not speaking from the position of somebody who just saw a cool toy and wants to play with it. I've been using it heavily on this project and it allowed me to write very reliable e2e tests that caught a lot of inconsistencies when the core was changing.

Please go ahead and try to sketch an alternative but try to do it against this code: https://github.com/blabno/exchange/blob/api-offer/api/src/testIntegration/java/bisq/api/http/OfferEndpointIT.java

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/74#issuecomment-518623236
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190806/706b8581/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list