[bisq-network/bisq] inject publickeyring (#3086)

Christoph Sturm notifications at github.com
Wed Aug 14 12:57:04 UTC 2019


> utACK
> 
> Don't know how the 'mergers' think about this but wouldn't it be cleaner if you rebase this on your previous PR (this PR doesn't only contain the inject publickeyring changes) ? You could add a 'blocked by #123' comment so it doesn't get merged before the parent. Would make for cleaner diffs

i can only rebase this pr once the other one is in master. and then i will rebase it and it will be much smaller. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3086#issuecomment-521234431
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190814/9d24731c/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list