[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq Monero Wallet (#110)

[woodser]

The Java library supports most (all?) of the functionality listed in this issue so I expect most of the work will be in integrating the library into Bisq's current framework.

I'd recommend using the native Java binding to Monero's wallet now that it's available instead of shipping and starting `monero-wallet-rpc` as part of the Bisq application which might simplify things some.

Is multisig intended to be integrated?  The library supports multisig but coordinating and exchanging multisig information among participants is outside of the scope of the library, which @rbrunner7's [mms](https://rbrunner7.github.io/mms_full_manual) may be useful for (can/should something similar be implemented in Java?  Would that help?).  I expect some of the challenge will be in UX while the multsig wallet is synced among participants during creation and transacting.

I think a daemon should be shipped with Bisq but the user should be able to select their own daemon by URL.

This issue references proving transactions which I think [getTxKey()](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#getTxKey-java.lang.String-)/[checkTxKey()](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#checkTxKey-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-), [getTxProof()](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#getTxProof-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-)/[checkTxProof](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#checkTxProof-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-) or [getSpendProof()](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#getSpendProof-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-)/[checkSpendProof()](https://moneroecosystem.org/monero-java/monero/wallet/MoneroWallet.html#checkSpendProof-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-java.lang.String-) provides the functionality for.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/110#issuecomment-525510840
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190827/c97d337d/attachment-0001.html>