[bisq-network/proposals] Decentralize BSQ block explorer as we do with other Bisq infrastructure (#143)

wiz notifications at github.com
Thu Dec 5 11:19:55 UTC 2019


> I'd prefer to go with the current scheme, where the operator hosts it under one of their own domains, e.g. as @sqrrm has done with https://explorer.sqrrm.net.

You're right, we should use our own domain names as a better indicator of who is running them for trust reasons

> If the round-robin approach naively load balanced across these instances, the user could have a confusing experience

Alternatively we could ditch the round-robin idea and randomly select one for the user in the Bisq settings, which they could change manually if they wanted to later on.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/143#issuecomment-562087274
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191205/9d8f0010/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list