[bisq-network/bisq] Add command for signing windows executables with the default code signing certificate (#3772)

[Christoph Atteneder]

> I am not sure if the EV certificate is worth the hassle, nor am I sure how long it would take to develop reputation with the standard certificate.


Besides being more expensive an EV certificate has stronger KYC requirements. I have to have a look how difficult it would be to get one based on the existing code certificate I already have. 

Regarding reputation it seems you get it e.g. by getting signed applications installed. So I think maybe we could start with the current code signing certificate to see if it would gain enough reputation already after the next round of updates. @devinbileck What do you think?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3772#issuecomment-565017997
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191212/f750f768/attachment.html>