[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 8 (#417)

[Steve Jain]

> this still seems very high.

Yes, drastically. As noted above, the biggest item here is https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3643, which seems like mostly code comments to me. In my opinion this is the least valuable form of correction. The rest are relatively small, combined. I'm not sure why the previous typo compensation requests from rex4539 were accepted at 10 BSQ/typo, but I'm surprised they were.

> But I think we should try to get a discussion to bring different "departments" under a strategic umrella.

There is no coordinated effort but we're trying to do something of the sort. arunasurya is working on determining criteria for adding languages, and @julianknutsen [started discussion](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/150) on tracking expenses after each cycle to evaluate return on investment. 

I tend to encourage and discourage efforts across my own domains (website, docs, growth) based on a loose sense of how well the project is going. At this point, I'm not sure it makes sense to create another position for coordinating these activities. I think it's sufficient for the main "managers" in each area to have periodical discussions to determine how much leeway there is for less-critical items, and then merge accordingly (growth, translations, documentation, website, etc).

This case is a bit strange because it doesn't really fall under the purview of any particular function, so I'm not sure any amount of coordination would have helped...but fixing typos shouldn't ever be this big of a line-item either.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/417#issuecomment-565273951
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191212/00c77502/attachment-0001.html>