[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

[chimp1984]

> blindly hating on Denarius

No I don't hate Denarius, I don't know enough it have any opinion. But I hate the style of the discussion you and your supporters brought into our communication channel, including a rude insult of one of our most productive developers.

And I hate to spend effort on the wrong things and losing that time to spend for the important things. This descision on what a contributor spends their time is a personal subjective decision. The maintainers are not forced to spend time on reviewing, discussing and merging an asset with does not add value to Bisq by a probabilty of > 99% according to the statistics and experience we gained (this experience goes back to day 1 of Bisq but I don't want to spend effort to generate statistics for that). 

The assest which added value and which Bisq contributors from the cypherpunk ethos usually support (e.g. GRIN) can be counted on one hand. I still want to have a model where we are open to those without financial barrier, but not to be abused as free listing service from those with whom we have not much in common (e.g. shitcoins).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-565833852
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191215/c2f49572/attachment.html>