[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

[buzzkillb]

I like how BISQ works, I probably was a percentage of your volume for a bit on a main pair while I played around on the wallet. But the way you treated Carsen for making a mistake that wasn't listed in your documentation makes me wonder how you treat your users making mistakes on your platform and what type of support would be offered if issues arise. What ends up happening is you have users like myself who can help make markets and donate BSQ to keep these projects listed, not even caring anymore to use your product. Is it a loss for me? Not at all. Is it a loss for you? Eventually it will be as people are soured on the way you are treating Bitcoin forks, forks that are making the overall scope of cryptocurrencies stronger.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-565835408
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191215/fe871fc0/attachment.html>