[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

Carsen Klock notifications at github.com
Mon Dec 16 17:44:42 UTC 2019


> 
> Additionally, Bisq should make the application fee very expensive, and only allow the reimbursement of the application fee if the asset listing is approved and meets certain criteria for trading volume within the first few months. This will allow legitimate projects that earn fees for Bisq to get listed for free, but financially disincentivize scammers and shitcoiners from wasting our time, since they know they will just be paying the DAO to reject them.
> 

If you will be doing anything with raising any fees, you should make a transparent itemized list of all costs associated with listing a new asset. In my opinion, it seems a majority of the asset submission is upon the submitter, which they should know what they are actually paying for anyways. By raising a fee also, you could just be giving the actual scammers an advantage and opening to just pay the fees, as they usually have funds from previous scams to pay for listing fees etc. you guys should think of a better method of verifying coin projects rather than just charging a fee/regular asset submission process.




-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-566166704
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191216/d096d698/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list