[bisq-network/proposals] Whitelist major banks and regions using 2FA to avoid mandatory account signing. (#154)

[taxd]

@mpolavieja It is the sender of fiat that has to justify that a chargeback is legitimate, and that tends to involve a court process. I see no incentives for a sender to try to get a chargeback invoking a bitcoin purchase as the reason. The sender will possibly lose his bank account, will become well known by the authorities and it is highly unlikely he will get his fiat back.
In the two jurisdictions I am familiar with, the receiver of a bank transfer is VERY strongly protected by the law against any tampering of his account.

Bisq is having very little trading activity and I see little, if any, interest in making Bisq more userfriendly for an average person who does not know what an elliptic curve is. I am afraid Bisq will die unless this is improved.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/154#issuecomment-566278740
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191216/c369ee53/attachment.html>