[bisq-network/proposals] Increase security deposits to avoid future trades and mediation. (#155)

user718141 notifications at github.com
Mon Dec 23 05:11:29 UTC 2019


> I don't see much of an asymmetry here. Before the fiat transfer the buyer can default, but will then lose his security deposit. After the fiat transfer the seller can default, but will then lose his security deposit.

How about having trades canecellable by each party for a refund (until transferring due to technical constraints)?

> I suggest simplicity here, i. e. not finetuning the security deposits but having the same for alts and fiat and for buyer and seller.

How about zero deposits for each party (for on-board friendliness and trader responsibility)?

> I would like the situation that mediation and appealing to the refund agent is only needed because of bugs or technical problems. All other problems should be solved by the traders. They can do this, having a communication channel, incentives and the terms written out in the contract.

How about remove meditation (shouldn't be motivated by bugs/tech problems). Arbitration handles soft disputes from bugs/technical problems and hard disputes.


In all, simplicity and good faith will succeed...



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/155#issuecomment-568357470
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191222/36af92a6/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list