[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

Aleksej notifications at github.com
Sun Dec 29 00:35:12 UTC 2019


Not a popular opinion within contributors, but I actually think the best solution would be to make altcoin listing not require a PR and add altcoin listing within the app itself, if that is possible code-wise.

I do think most altcoins are just there to grab some quick cash, but I don't think we should generalize in our listings and make it harder then it needs to be. If we make the process not require any dev effort long term, we could have a win-win situation where everyone is happy.

I think that in a perfect world we could review every altcoin and figure out which ones are bad apples and which are fine, but I don't think we should waste our resources on a job that isn't that rewarding. We should let users make Bisq what it is, not just contributors. Bisq isn't a great project only because it has great contributors, but because it has great users as well.

Most popular altcoins should optimally be automatically listed in drop down menu and all of those altcoin dealings, I think, should be left mostly to the users. Altcoins are generally easy to deal with from Bisq's perspective, no chargeback risk, easy to prove payment and etc. There isn't much to worry about here, I think users could handle it and contributors would have less things to take care of.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-569462925
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191228/00848e9d/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list