[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

[Manfred Karrer]

@justinvforvendetta 
I have not called out any particular coin as shitcoin.

See the initial proposal from @chimp1984 . Many coins listed don't care at all to get traded on Bisq, and it seems their only intention is to have another exchange on their webpage to pump up their scam. 

@alexej996 
Bisq tried many approaches in the past and fact is that way too much effort went into asset listing for very little return (see number above). Automated listing would cause many problems (that is why there are minimal requirements) and listing ICO coins would add unnecessary legal risks to Bisq. The above proposal has a reasonable idea. If that is too complex to find consensus I think we should just halt adding any asset until consensus if found and avoid to waste more time on that topic. Bisq has much more important things to solve than to add each release a bunch of altcoins where 90% are never get traded anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-569474228
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191228/55318c79/attachment.html>