[bisq-network/proposals] Host downloads on self-managed server (#72)

[KanoczTomas]

@HarryMacfinned you are right. I think once the request gets voted on, it has no use. But for the STASI comment we should make the compensation request completely anonymous. If anonymity is the concern it can not be on github at all, no exposure to the public internet at all. Or plausible deniabilty has to be used.

The proof of concept I made shows archiving can be done, and if I could do it so easily any malicious user can. And safe is to assume they already did - hey I might be a malicious user as well!

Lets focus on the solution to this valid problem which you brought up. Should we make the compensation request creation (it is true btw for reimbursement requests as well, people mostly do not open them to not expose themselfes) totally anonymous? E.g. opening one within Bisq itself?

You are right that maybe we should not archive it, how about stopping others from doing so? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/72#issuecomment-463990118
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190215/14bd1ae6/attachment.html>