[bisq-network/proposals] Simplify trade fee model (#64)

[Steve Jain]

It seems like the last proposal was only rejected on hopes that a revised fee explanation would cause less confusion.

That hasn't worked. Reducing confusion and lowering maker fees sound like good ways to increase liquidity, and since low liquidity might be one of Bisq's biggest flaws, I am in favor of the proposed fee structure.

I find the BitMEX article conceptually interesting, but not sure if the 'call option' dynamic is worth addressing right now unless it is a practical issue (public support inquiries indicate it isn't, but only arbitrators have the requisite perspective).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/64#issuecomment-451486878
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190104/e63b3ce3/attachment-0001.html>