[bisq-network/proposals] Remove requirement for PR for listing an asset (#67)

[Manfred Karrer]

> _This is a Bisq Network proposal. Please familiarize yourself with the [submission and review process](https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html)._

As it turned out the goal for requiring a PR with address validation and adding the asset to work as a "spam filter" did not really work. From the assets added 3 months ago 95% have never been traded and all efforts for review, communication, merge was for nothing. 

To educate developers to make a correct PR turned out to be a hard effort and at the end it would be much less effort if a Bisq developer adds the coin and the address validation (if needed). Most assets use a very simple default regex validation.

But I would even suggest to remove the address validation requirement as well as that effort (specially if a Bisq dev need to do it) is not worth the effort if the asset is not traded frequently on Bisq and that is the default case for the big majority. Arbitration cases with mistakes for adding an incorrect address are very rare and easy to solve (cancel trade). 

If you support that please up-vote, otherwise down-vote.

@blabno @cbeams @ripcurlx Please add your comments as well!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190115/9a5fd919/attachment-0001.html>