[bisq-network/proposals] New concept for Asset handling (#68)

[Peter at Clearwater-Trust.com]

I really like the idea of easily adding assets in the client with a BSQ registration fee. Using individual nodes to vote for inclusion is clever and maybe a bonus but certainly not necessary if the UI is able to filter the list. If the asset is listed, registration fee burned and trade volume meets requirements, then the DAO can be summoned if there is a problem (scam). Otherwise, the asset is listed, registration fee burned and removed automatically for inactivity. Or, everybody trades the new asset and lives happily ever after without DAO or developer input.

If the asset is listed with the incorrect symbol, the registration fee is burned, trade volume will not meet requirements and the ticker symbol is removed automatically. Maybe Bisq will become the default naming convention?

Address verification can be added to preferred assets, but I agree, is probably not necessary since the trade can be canceled.

It's worth mentioning that cross-chain trades are the main fee driver on Bisq and should be simplified and encouraged wherever possible. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/68#issuecomment-454543185
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190115/53188736/attachment-0001.html>