[bisq-network/proposals] Remove requirement for PR for listing an asset (#67)

[Bernard Labno]

For me ideal option would be if I had permission to edit those PRs prepared by external devs. That would make the process fastest.
On the other hand, I think that we cannot trust that those validators delivered by 3rd parties are correct and can potentially reject addresses that are correct.
I think that safest way is to check if address is not empty string and that's all.

So I'm for dropping requirement of providing address validator in asset listing PR.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-454695282
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190116/561a960e/attachment.html>