[bisq-network/proposals] Remove requirement for PR for listing an asset (#67)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Thu Jan 17 10:52:48 UTC 2019


@cbeams 

Yes the basic informational requirements stay the same.
I would like even to create a onw repo, just to keep the main repo clean from too many altcoin requests. Over time we want to get our GH issue list also cleaned up and then to have 100s of tangling requests would be another pain. If they live in their custom repo they hurt less.

And yes they still can do it themselfes.  

And fully agree to the docs part!

Any concerns if we create a own repo for that? I would call it asset-listing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-455129256
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190117/07bb0a3a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list