[bisq-network/proposals] Add bonus payment for seed nodes operators when node has 99.9% availibility (#102)

[Manfred Karrer]

> _This is a Bisq Network proposal. Please familiarize yourself with the [submission and review process](https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html)._

We had recently many problmes with seed nodes and that could even cause a failed DAO voting round, beside problems with disputes and trades. We need to ensure that the nodes are runing 99.9% stable. It is understandable that operators are not always be able to deal with the problems as they can be complex and can require some dev background, but at the end analysing the log file was enough to find the problem. It is clear that the relative small BSQ payment is only covering the server costs and basic maintanence like update or restart if needed but not further investigations work.

So to fix the incentive strructure for operators I propose 2 changes to the compensation model for node operators:
1. If extra time is spent on investigating problems, just add that to the compensation request additional to the normal server costs. 
2. If a node runs very stable (metrics need to be defined, but something like >99% uptime and no DAO state conflicts) the operator should get an extra bonus. I suggest a bonus of 400 BSQ/month, but up for discussion whats a good value here. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/102
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190712/273ec8f4/attachment.html>