[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[Christoph Atteneder]

> If we are not going to use the icon to represent other things such as 2 account verification, I agree with Steve that the clock icon is best suited as it objectively represents the idea of account age, leaving trust to the interpretation of the user. Maybe not as UI friendly but it is more neutral and less slippery from a "legal" point of view.

The problem with the clock icon is, that we want to communicate three states with it:
- account is signed
- account is signed and limits where lifted
- account is signed and can sign other accounts

This states are not always connect to time (only for our first account signing implementation), but also depend on the kind of account signing. So it might be a little bit misleading in the end.

I do agree that we need to take care not to communicate too much trust as there won't be a system where we could guarantee that you won't be scammed (a trusted account could also be stolen later).

I will think about a different icon or no icon at all (as suggested by @flix1) to prevent this misunderstanding of trust.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-516745762
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190731/5ca16d51/attachment.html>