[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[mpolavieja]

@ripcurlx,   Is a longer trade period going to be implemented for trades involving unsigned buyers and signers? If so, the signer could have more leeway to wait at least 3 or 4 working days after he receives the fiat payment to make sure there is no chargeback.   Another approach would be to just advise the signer to open a dispute if they feel they did not have enough time to confirm there is no chargeback.

Maybe an internal soft-limit could be implemented, so the new account would only get signed if there are more than X days between the "payment started" and "payment received" events.   If this information could also be hashed into the witness, it could maybe be used in a future implementation as a negative/positive reputation metric of reckless/trustworthy signers?

Knowing that info about how much signers wait on average would be a very interesting feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-499721944
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190606/7e70acb1/attachment.html>