[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[mpolavieja]

> If we add more and more granular filtering options it would split up liquidity more and more and it will get more complicated for new users. What do you think?

Market makers are very sensitive users (or at least they should be).  With more filtering options it is true that it could be split liquidity so it is hard and frustrating for new users to join the liquidity of old users.  But are we going to get a lot of market makers without the necessary tools to protect themselves?   Not easy at all for me to answer this question. 

Regarding the other questions, could it be a simpler approach that the UI shows 0 age account for unsigned accounts and the number of days for signed accounts?   And maybe only an additional info to make clear an account has signing capability (regardless of how it reached maturity).   

Regarding filtering options, I suggest to wait and see before implementing any filtering, in the meantime rough filtering can be done through trading amounts (i.e. if I post an offer of 0,125 BTC I know that an immature or very young account won´t be able to take my offer).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-499823589
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190607/a6e5e8ae/attachment.html>