[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 2 #287 (#287)

[sqrrm]

As the first proposal of the two got accepted there should be no need to ask for compensation again.

@ManfredKarrer This case would be a typical reason for having the extra time between proposal submission and voting (BREAK1). It's currently set at 1 day (149 blocks) which was perhaps not enough to conclude this discussion before voting started. I don't see a need to change it, just pointing out why it's there and that perhaps we'll need to change it in the future.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/287#issuecomment-502733626
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190617/29a665d0/attachment.html>