[bisq-network/proposals] Increase buy limit for new accounts from 0.01 to 0.02 BTC (#95)

[Manfred Karrer]

I think we use DAO voting too lightly. It should be the last resort if there is no consensus found in discussions. People who vote should be aware of their responsibility. This proposal is a good example where a small change can have very severe consequences. If BTC price goes to > 15k  (0.02 BTC = 300 USD) it might be enough to attract the scammer to come back. Who will handle the mess then? It took me 3 weeks fulltime and brought me close to burnout when I did it. I am not sure if anyone will play that role if that would happen again. Not talking about the reputation damage if we get scammed again and the increase of risks that regulators might see that as reason to focus on Bisq.
I think such proposals should be discussed more in depth and also in personal calls as written discussions tend to not deliver so good results. 

And we have to take care to not inherit the bad properties from democratic voting where those who vote will not be responsible to deal with the mess they create. Also it need to be made very clear that those who vote know exactly what they vote on (read and follow the discussion).

Just my 5 cents.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/95#issuecomment-503976211
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190620/adcf343a/attachment-0001.html>