[bisq-network/proposals] Increase buy limit for new accounts from 0.01 to 0.02 BTC (#95)

[Félix]

> **Who will handle the mess then?** It took me 3 weeks fulltime and brought me close to burnout when I did it. I am not sure if anyone will play that role if that would happen again. Not talking about the reputation damage if we get scammed again and the increase of risks that regulators might see that as reason to focus on Bisq.

**Nobody**. Nobody should handle the mess. 
This makes me think that 2-of-3 multisig and arbitration really have to go or at least the role of the arbitrator must be so clearly defined and reduced in scope that he assumes zero responsability for any scams and only a limited responsability for mistakes. 2-of-2 multisig with no arbitration and eventually atomic swaps should be our goal.

Reputation damage is a problem for the DAO. How should the DAO respond? By investing in research and development of new security tools and protocols and making them available to users. Not by restricting users.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/95#issuecomment-504352300
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190621/af78fd31/attachment.html>