[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[mpolavieja]

> On the first day everyone will have 0 days age since signing. Might look weird in the beginning, but I think it should be fine on the long run.

If old account age is greater than 111 days (days from 1 March to arbitrators signing date), is it possible to show old account age instead of the new one? 

>QUESTION: Do we want to continue to calculate the trade limits as mentioned above based on the account creation date or based on the signing of the account age?

I think trading limits should be calculated based on the signing date, but as you say, an exception should be made for those users with a creation account age greater than 111 days (i.e. days from 1 March to arbitrators signing date). 

Regarding the 0,01BTC limit, my initial thought was that it would get lifted as soon as the signing trade settles.  Now that you raise the possibility of waiting 30 days I am not that sure.  Once 2FA is enabled then I do think it would be too conservative.

> Are the allowed trade time limits going to change?
 ATM I wasn't thinking about changing them

Ok


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-504404233
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190621/7b2e7db1/attachment.html>